These are results examining the relation between Relation and Mention type classification.
<p>
Features:<br>
The features used for classifying mentions are the text of the mention and two words of context on either side of the mention.
<br>
The features used for classifying relations are just the text of the sentence containing the relation, not including the text of the mentions.
<br>
<h2> Coarse-grained relation types (5) </h2>
<table border=1 cellpadding=5>
<tr><td/><td colspan="2">Mention</td><td colspan="2">Relation</td></tr>
<tr><td/><td>Test</td><td>Train</td><td>Test</td><td>Train</td></tr>
<tr><td>Relations Alone</td><td/><td/><td>52.1</td><td>84.8</td></tr>
<tr><td>Mentions Alone</td><td>78.5</td><td>91.5</td><td></td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td>Relations Given Mention Type</td><td></td><td></td><td>74.6</td><td>97.3</td></tr>
<tr><td>Mentions Given Relation Type</td><td>80.5</td><td>94.0</td><td></td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td>Joint Mentions And Relations</td><td>77.0</td><td>87.8</td><td>61.4</td><td>87.8</td></tr>
</table>

<h2> Fine-grained relation types (24) </h2>
<table border=1 cellpadding=5>
<tr><td/><td colspan="2">Mention</td><td colspan="2">Relation</td></tr>
<tr><td/><td>Test</td><td>Train</td><td>Test</td><td>Train</td></tr>
<tr><td>Relations Alone</td><td/><td/><td>26.7</td><td>75.6</td></tr>
<tr><td>Relations Given Mention Type</td><td></td><td></td><td>45.3</td><td>96.8</td></tr>
<tr><td>Mentions Given Relation Type</td><td>81.2</td><td>95.2</td><td></td><td></td></tr>
</table>